Accusing the poor victims of immorality when they are not alive to defend their reputation is such a repugnant accusation, it only serves to display the delinquency of the Indians running the show.
As if we have not witnessed such tactics before. We all saw how they tried to use these same antics when they murdered Javed and Amin of Bomai and tried to claim that the innocent students were "terrorists." How those claims fell by the wayside later!
Then they tried to paint Mohiuddin Malik of Pakherpoor as a militant who was killed in an "encounter." It was proven that he infact was killed in cold blood by the Indian troops.
In both these cases, we saw how the Indian officials as well as their propaganda machinery tried unsuccessfully to paint the innocent victims as anything but innocent. And the culprits are still unpunished and maybe even have been rewarded.
Who is responsible for all this mayhem? Certainly we cannot keep blaming Indian Intelligence pawns or operatives for these repugnant crimes; they are only following orders--But the question is, whose orders? Is Sonia Gandhi, Manmohan Singh, and their other henchmen privy to all this mayhem, which without a doubt the Indian Intelligentsia is perpetrating on our streets in Kashmir? I hold Sonia Gandhi personally responsible for all the deaths in Kashmir: This is my conclusion from my analysis of all the events of the past few months since Kashmiris came out in unison, peacefully protesting against Indian rule.
It suits Sonia Gandhi's families' hegemony as future rulers of India to keep Kashmir as an Indian possession. Anything else would make her family fortunes doubtful as the opposition would pounce on her perceived weakness were Kashmir to secede under her watch. Therefore, for her, it's a choice between innocent Kashmiri lives, or the future Prime Ministerial job for her son. Her choice seems to have been obvious with the recent events.
I do not make this accusation lightly. Ever since Kashmiris starting protesting peacefully, all subsequent murders have an uncanny similarity. All victims have been innocent Kashmiris who were falsely accused of being something else: clearly an attempt to enrage Kashmiris to either take up arms against the Indians or simply take other drastic steps. Anything to justify the presence of Indian troops here. These events seem to have taken the most sinister turn since the Kashmiri people took to the streets in silent protests as opposed to taking up arms. It does seem that the Indians prefer that Kashmiris would rather take up arms. After all, it becomes easier for them to paint us as raged up Islamic fanatics with AK-47's by our side. They fear that the world will see the truth about them suppressing an unarmed resistance. As it is evident, it is easy to paint themselves as fighting an armed insurgency rather than being seen as oppressors.
This is also evident from the recent statements from their top officials, who keep repeating the concocted fable of "fighting insurgency" as a reason to keep the million Indian troops on the streets of Kashmir.
We will call their bluff and bring the truth out to the world: this I promise.
